Archive for January, 2011

An overlooked, sure-fire way to regain work time

I was talking to a client who – like most of us – needed more hours in the day, and he complained that part of the problem was that he was required to generate long reports, and it took him hours and hours just to type them in. So I asked him, how does he type? Turns out he uses two fingers to peck at the keyboard. I asked him, why not ten? Why doesn’t he touch type?

Of course he couldn’t touch type, nor was he planning to learn to; and neither do almost all the knowledge workers I know. Which is amazing, if you stop to consider it, because if your job involves primarily one machine, and you can operate that machine faster or slower, why not learn to do it faster?

Touch typing allows you to bang out some 60 words per minute (wpm). Hunt and Peck – the common use of two fingers – gives maybe 30 wpm. So it stands to reason that any large organization would benefit by mandating touch typing classes for all employees who use computers on a daily basis. The payback would be huge, for the company and for the individual. It takes a few weeks, and then – from that day to the end of one’s career – one can be so much faster on the job, saving precious lifetime for either more output or more leisure. Why don’t they do so?

Typewriter keysPart of the problem may be that typing is no longer a profession. In days past, there were typists: people – mostly women – adept in the use of a typewriter. They were trained and hired to type fast and accurately; in fact, some were stenographers, trained in the art of shorthand, both with pencil and with a specialized steno machine. The extreme speeds achieved by stenography were especially sought in real-time transcription as used in a court of law, allowing as they did to capture over 120 wpm. By contrast, today a lot of typing is done by people with other job names – managers, engineers, technicians… people who are judged on other skills, to the neglect of keyboard wizardry. We’d moved much of the task of typing from the secretaries to the managers and engineers, but forgot to train the latter in the basic skills of the former.

Now, stenography is almost extinct these days, and requires some pretty specialized equipment and training; I’m not suggesting you master it. But there are countless schools and software programs that teach you touch typing, and it uses the same keyboard you already have; nor do you need anyone’s permission to learn it.

Think about it…

Photo courtesy Valeriana Solaris, shared on flickr under CC license.

Join us at IORG!

The Information Overload Research Group (IORG) is looking to expand its membership, and if you are an Information Overload practitioner or researcher I heartily encourage you to join our ranks.

IORG started off in 2007 as an informal “Infomania Workshop” of some two dozen interested people, and this evolved into an official non-profit interest group that had launched in a face to face conference in NYC in mid-2008. This group comprises academics, industry people, consultants, analysts and others – people from diverse backgrounds that share a common passion to understand and help mitigate the information overload problem that is threatening the productivity and quality of life of good people the world over.

IORG is a young organization, and at this time is busily exploring directions and ideas for furthering this mission. As its co-founder and president, I invite you to look us up at http://www.iorgforum.org and if you share the passion, join our number, participate, communicate, and influence our direction!

Facebook: a third factor in enterprise Information Overload?

Information Overload can have manifold manifestations: physicians have more new articles coming out in their field than they can possibly cover, consumers have too many TV channels to choose from comfortably, journalists have a hard time staying on top of breaking news, and so forth. But in the enterprise, the domain of the knowledge worker population I belong to and serve, Information Overload took a fairly predictable and well-characterized form, and it had two underlying components: Email Overload and Interruptions (a.k.a. distractions). Until recently, this was it; find a way to handle the hundred or (many) more incoming emails a day, and to keep in check the endless intrusions of BlackBerries and other interrupters, and you could have IO under control.

But in the last year I begin to see signs that a third component may be joining these two: Facebook. I first caught on over a year ago when a senior manager asked me: when is Facebook going to replace email in his company? He had noticed that his kids’ generation don’t bother to maintain an email account; it’s all in Facebook for them. He also noticed that these kids, or their peers, will very soon hit the workplace…

Now, I wouldn’t hold my breath for email to disappear; but there are ever more signs that the arrival of Gen Y in the enterprise will bring with it a growing reliance on both internal and external social networks; and my bet is that any attempt to ban the external ones will be as short-lived as were the attempts to ban the World Wide Web in the mid-nineties. Facebook and similar tools will be part of enterprise life, including personal use, and many people with foresight realize that. The question is, what will this do to Information Overload?

That this is a relevant question I see from the number of people who approach me, after my lectures on IO, and express concern, or seek advice, around Facebook Overload. The temptation to check and update Facebook around the clock may strike Gen X and Boomer workers as silly, but it is the younger people – who already do this in high school – who will matter before long. If Facebook is addictive, they will arrive at the workplace with the habit already established. If so, we IO practitioners will need to add Facebook to the twin factors of email and interruptions, and we will need to have answers and solutions to this new aspect of the old problem.

What do you think? Do share your thoughts on this: will Facebook IO be a problem 5 years from now? Is it a problem already? And what can we do about it?

The ease of getting connected

Welcome to a new decade, promising ever more technological change!

Here is one change that came to my mind: I remember, as anyone of my generation does, how you used to have to wait more than a year to have a phone line delivered by the state-run phone monopoly of the time. In fact, after I got married in the mid-seventies and waited a couple of years, I got a shared line with my absent-minded neighbor, who would forget to hang up after conversing…

This is now a fading memory; these days, we take it for granted that we can get connected with practically no barriers. The competition in the telephony business means that providers are bending over backward to give us access: one of my acquaintances just had a new voice-over-Internet telephone line delivered in less than a day by his Internet provider. And when he decided to cancel it, it took two days of phone calls and endless waiting for “the next available agent” to get rid of this line. It is now easier to get a telephone than it is to remove it!

This actually has serious implications for Information Overload: I wouldn’t go back to the old system, but I must observe that with no barriers and negligible costs, people communicate non-stop whether it’s advisable or not. When telephones were a scarce commodity and their use – especially long distance use – was expensive, people thought before picking one up. When international messaging was based on paper mail, and cost postage, people weighed their words. And when instant messaging involved telegrams that cost by the word, brevity was king. Not any more.

Now, if only we could make email cost by the word, or by the addressee…   :-)