Archive for July, 2011

He’s working!

A relative of a distinguished Professor told me that he had the habit of sitting in an armchair at home with his eyes closed. When someone would come in and try to converse with him, the Prof would say “Quiet! I’m working!”

As indeed he was… to sit quietly and think is a key element at the heart of an academic’s job; they need to disconnect from all distractions and THINK.

One must note that this particular scholar is now in his eighties, so his habits had evolved in the middle of the previous century. I wonder whether the professors being grown today will be able to sit still long enough to experience the benefit of such a practice?…

How to keep distribution lists short

I was lecturing about Information Overload at an MBA course in Haifa University, and a student shared a lovely story. Long ago, she said, before email replaced paper correspondence, she used to work at a company where memos were written on special forms that came as a three-layer stack with chemical copying. You’d write or type the top layer and two copies were created on the layers below.

This was very convenient (you didn’t need to mess with Carbon Paper) but had one side effect: you could only create up to three copies at once. If you needed more, you’d need to write on a new stack, laboriously copying what you’d written before.

Guess what, she concluded the story: people would make every effort to drop names from the dist list of the memo, until there were only three names on it.

Too bad email doesn’t have a similar incentive for frugal sending…

Telemarketing Information Overload

Today I got a call from a telemarketer who did her best to entice me to subscribe to a certain business journal. I told her I already had a subscription to a similar one, and she went out of her way to explain to me that hers contained that much more – more articles, more pages, more information!

I may be too polite, so she kept going on even after I pointed out that I barely read a tenth of the pages of the journal I already receive; she continued until I decided enough was enough and told her that I make a living by consulting to organizations how to reduce the damage caused their employees by information overload. That left the good woman speechless and she let me be.

And if you think about it, we do receive all these invitations to subscribe to all these magazines – do they really think we’re starved for information here? Marketing newspapers isn’t even like the proverbial selling of refrigerators to Eskimos, since a fridge can at least do no harm; selling people more information is more like selling a plague to the healthy…

Incidentally, before she said goodbye the telemarketer lady had a moment of introspection, and she told me that yes, indeed, free time is a precious commodity, and she can see how too much information can be a problem. Who knows, perhaps I gave her the push that will propel her into a successful career in Information Overload consulting herself? :-)

Audio recording of IORG “Literary Salon” webinar available for download

The IORG “Literary Salon” online event last week was very interesting, with five authors of books about Information Overload comign together to discuss their books.

A recording of the entire event is available for your enjoyment here. A summary by one of the attendees is available here.

Enjoy!

Yes, I do!

An attendee at a lecture at a multinational tech company pointed out to me that part of his problem with email overload stems from situations where he is part of a functional distribution list, say “All Engineering”. Some messages to the entire group he does need, but there are other specific recurrent  messages that other engineers need and he doesn’t. Then when he goes to the sender and asks to get off, he is told it can’t be done – you can’t “unsubscribe” from the list: if you’re an engineer, you are automatically included and cursed for all eternity to receive anything sent to “All Engineering”.

Now, it would be nice if the organization had communication tools that do allow unsubscribing from a list for specific types of messages; such tools can be developed and would certainly be worth the development cost. But until that happens, the issue boils down to this express or implied conversation:

Recipient: I need you to stop sending me the weekly debug report. I’m not involved in debugging.
Sender: Sorry, can’t help you there. I send it to “All Engineering”.
Recipient: Well, can’t you send it to a list of “All Engineering minus myself”?
Sender: You really mean I should craft a special dist list just for your convenience?!?!! Yeah right!

And this is where it ends, one line before the correct ending, which would add:

Recipient: Yes, I do!

This may sound presumptuous to the sender, but the recipient is right: he has every right to expect the sender go to this extra effort. It may take the sender five minutes, a small one-time effort – but it would save the recipient – possibly many of them – recurring distractions and time loss going forward. It is a reasonable request and in the best interest of the organization.

How do you react to such a demand? And, as a recipient, do you have the courage to say, Yes, I do?