The problem of Self-induced Interruptions

Recently I was talking to a senior manager about the role of BlackBerry alerts in information overload. The guy was quite aware of the impact, and told me he had turned off all incoming-email alerts on his device. Smart move!

Then he added that this move had limited effect because he was in the habit of checking the BlackBerry for new email every few minutes anyway.

This is a prime example of self-induced interruptions. People in this day and age are so addicted to the flow of messaging that even absent external interrupts they simply interrupt themselves. This was borne out by the research of Prof. Gloria Mark of UC Irvine: her observations of knowledge workers in their daily routine not only showed that they drop what they’re doing and switch to something else every 3 minutes on average; they also showed that half these interruptions are self-induced. It’s as if when a person has six minutes of uninterrupted time to focus their thinking and excel at their work, well, after three minutes they go “Oh my, I’ve been at this three minutes… maybe I should check my email, or Facebook, or just switch task for the heck of it?”

Of course some level of interruption in whatever we do is vital for our mental well-being, not to mention our lower back; before email people would still take breaks to go to the water cooler, after all. But they didn’t go to the water cooler ten times an hour, did they?

This situation may be linked to the hectic pace of life we all experience: perhaps people simply don’t have the attention span required to focus on any task for more than a few minutes at a stretch. If this is true, then we have a problem – there is more than enough data to prove that interruptions reduce creativity, productivity and peace of mind. And while fighting the external interruptions is relatively easy (if you get managerial support, at any rate) – you can turn off the alerts, or institute workplace agreements that safeguard some “quiet time” – I suspect that eliminating this internal drive to interrupt one’s own work will be much harder. And well worth the effort!

Share this:
  • email
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Slashdot
  • Reddit

Speed vs. Thought in email communications

Given that knowledge workers receive many more emails daily than they can possibly process, it is small wonder that some emails never get a response (the phenomenon called Online Silence, which I’ve discussed before). Indeed, the research shows that if a message isn’t replied to in a day or so, it is likely never to be answered.

There is, however, an interesting exception: messages that require an answer but also necessitate thought.

A great example are requests for LinkedIn endorsements (also known as recommendations). The way it works, in my experience, is this: Jack asks his LinkedIn contact, Jill, to provide a recommendation for him. Jill replies the next day “Glad to do it!”, but in fact does not do it that day, nor in the following week, nor, in some cases, in a month. Then, having completely forgotten about it, Jack has a nice surprise when a LinkedIn message announces that Jill has recommended him!

What is going on in this scenario is this: Jill does want to endorse Jack, since there is some degree of personal friendship between them (no one asks enemies to endorse them!). However, writing a recommendation requires some heavy mental lifting: you need to really think carefully what to write and how to phrase it to convey your exact intention. You need to clear some uninterrupted time to devote to the task, and in this age of the Soundbyte and the Blackberry this is a rare luxury indeed. So Jill puts the matter on her To Do list, but not at high urgency; this is a classic case of a task that is important but not urgent in her mind. Only after weeks have gone by does she decide to get it done, since letting it drop is not an option.

The same thing tends to happen to any email that is too important to ignore but too thought-consuming to do in one’s stride: emails whose processing involves reading long but valuable articles are another good example. Which is a shame, really, because in a sane world these thinking-related tasks would not be delayed for more than a couple of days; yet in our world we find it a real challenge to attend to them at all…

Share this:
  • email
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Slashdot
  • Reddit

Six ways your email can reach the wrong eyes

One mistake people often make is assuming the emails they send are private.

All hell can break lose when an email is disclosed to unintended parties. There are many ways this can happen to a message (and Murphy’s laws will ensure it does, at the worst possible time). For instance:

  1. The recipient might forward it inappropriately. This is probably the most common occurrence. Sometimes it’s an act of pure idiocy, as when you send someone a personal comment about X and before you know it they send it to X or his colleagues. But often it’s indirect: the recipient forwards a mail containing a long thread, without noticing that somewhere down the thread is something that is best not shared with one of the list of addressees.
  2. The recipient might try to forward it appropriately, but sends it to the wrong party instead: with today’s address auto-complete feature, anything’s possible.
  3. The recipient might “outsource” its processing. This is common with managers: you send them a mail and they let their TA or admin handle it.
  4. The recipient might expose it due to lax information security, e.g. by having their PC hacked into, or losing their BlackBerry with your mail on it. For that matter, it may also be hacked into in your own machine’s Sent Items folder.
  5. The recipient might print it out on paper, then dump it – a whole world of leak opportunities there.
  6. The authorities might grab it. Any email may be subject to discovery in case of litigation. A more extreme case: when Enron collapsed in disgrace the US government grabbed the email database off its servers and made hundreds of thousands of emails publicly available (e.g. here). It’s an invaluable source of statistics for researchers of email behavior, but in the process it exposes many sensitive and personal messages.

So, what is one to do? We’ll explore in a coming post; until then, be careful what you write!

Share this:
  • email
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Slashdot
  • Reddit

The Warm Fuzzy factor in communications

These days I make a living helping people avoid spending all night on processing their email overload, so it was with some amusement that I remembered how I used to spend my own nights communicating with people – but enjoying every minute of it!

This was back when I was in my teens and twenties, and I had a ham radio station I’d built myself (of course). I’d stay up late at night (when shortwave reception tends to improve) trying to connect to as many other radio amateurs in distant lands as I could raise in my earphones. It was a fun hobby, and it gave me much pleasure.

Morse KeyThere are some analogies to email: I was communicating across the globe; I made contact with many people I’d never met before; and, let’s face it, much of what we said (or pounded out in Morse code) was not very interesting per se: weather conditions, equipment and antenna configurations mostly – about as fascinating as much incoming email. And yet it was fun – an adjective no one would ascribe to email.

The difference, I guess, lies with the “warm fuzzy” factor. Email at its best can be very efficient, but tends to be dry, businesslike, and soulless. Sure, there are exceptions: some emails among friends and relatives can be heart warming indeed, but these are buried under the flood of utilitarian work email and useless unsolicited messages. The radio contact we had, even when done via dots and dashes, was a very human form of contact; it was synchronous, interactive, and for a few minutes would make two remote people feel friendship. I wish email was like that…

But then, the warm fuzzy factor does exist today – in the social networks world, notably the less business oriented ones like Facebook and MySpace. I encounter many people (above high school age, anyway) that express real concern with Facebook addiction and time drain, but even these would admit they find the experience pleasing: you see your friends, exchange comments and pleasantries, and feel part of a human activity, just like radio amateurs do.

But of course, none of these Facebook users could build a radio rig – or an internet router – from scratch…  :-)

Image courtesy Anthony Catalano, shared on flickr under CC license.
Share this:
  • email
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Slashdot
  • Reddit

The demise of Google Wave

When Google announced Wave, that innovative Email / IM / Collaboration product, I’d found it very exciting. I was happy to see in it many concepts I’ve been awaiting for a long time, notably a very nicely done “threaded inbox” paradigm. Still, after playing with it a little I began to refer to it in my lectures on Information Overload as “The jury is still out on whether this will reduce the overload or increase it”.

Well, the jury is back. A year later, Google announces it will phase out Wave. It just didn’t catch…

It’s tempting to claim it was ahead of its time, thus blaming the users for shortsightedness. The truth, I suspect, is that it wasn’t ahead of its time – it was ahead of the hardware, not the computer hardware, but the brain’s. The Wave interface was an explosive riot of information, color and visual detail; and the use model was likewise very overwhelming, with multiple conversations going on in parallel on the screen in many modalities. It was sort of like everyone shouting at once… while waving pictures and screening videos at the same time. Despite claims to the contrary, human brains are just not up to such a level of parallel input processing and multitasking. It was simply too much… or so I think; I’d love to hear your thoughts on the matter.

Google Wave User Interface

Screenshot courtesy marketingfacts, shared on flickr under CC license.

This is a pity, because had Google limited the wizardry to just part of the functionality – say, a superb media-rich threaded email program without real time messaging and retroactive editing – it could have ended up with a very nice email client. Which they still might, since they say they will port some of the functionality to their other products.

Still, we owe the Google team our respect for what was a truly exuberant experiment in pushing collaboration to new realms. I can’t wait to see what they will think of next!…

Share this:
  • email
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Slashdot
  • Reddit

The Dawn of the Blackberry Era

Today RIM announced the BlackBerry Torch 9800, which is even more chock-full of amazing technology than the model before it, which was itself ahead of its predecessor, which was…

This has been going on for a long time, but it reminds me that the sequence did have a beginning – yes, there was a first BlackBerry, which had perhaps appeared, fully formed, from the primordial chaos…

I collect items from the History of Computing, and I have a sample of that earliest BlackBerry, the model 950, introduced in 1998, which you see in this photo.

BlackBerry 950 - the original BlackBerry

The interesting thing is that this model precedes the addiction that has earned its successors the nickname “CrackBerry”. It had a unique usage model: it was really an advanced pager, not a telephone, and its primary use was to page people in your organization, not to process email. It did have email, but the tiny screen tended to limit its use to urgent stuff only. The text based paging, however, was quite useful: I remember on the very day that I was given one of these – as an early adopter – I left my sweater in a conference room and rather than backtrack across campus I could text a friend in the room to collect it for me. The use of such real time communication-on-the-go, at a time before cellphones became ubiquitous, became immediately evident to me. The tiny keyboard that gave the device its imaginative name (the keys look like the bumps on a blackberry fruit) and the thumb wheel for scrolling were already present, and remained hallmarks of the RIM devices for years; that thumbwheel was extremely natural and easy to use, and I still regret its passing…

BlackBerry 957Of course, the tiny screen was soon replaced with the full size we expect today: the model 957 in the photo at right is from the year 2000 (Y2K, remember?) and allowed one to process email comfortably, opening the door to the email addiction I help companies fight these days. The pager function would soon disappear and cellular telephony would be added in 2002, giving us the smartphone paradigm we’re so used to these days.

But it all started as a humble pager with a tiny screen…

Share this:
  • email
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Slashdot
  • Reddit

The curse of being in the know

The desire to “Be in the Know” has no doubt been around since our stone age ancestors had developed language. In addition to the actual value of the information, it meant being close to the seat of power, to where the decisions of the tribe or village or city-state were being made or influenced. It was a heady feeling and a powerful practical tool in social interactions; it could even be a survival skill.

Unfortunately, this desire to share in the flow of information has taken a nasty turn when Information Overload came around. It used to be that in order to know what’s going on you had to connect – socialize – gossip – with the right people; a few would suffice, and you’d get the benefits of the social interaction to boot. Today, we have email and the ‘net, where the available information is infinite, and most of the information is useless to you. Nevertheless, people retain that urge to know as much as possible, and they keep scanning the stream of messages and updates to the exclusion of real human interaction and useful work.

Consider this manager I was interviewing about his email load a while back. I inquired about a given message in his Inbox, and the guy told me it arrives, regular as clockwork, every week. When I pressed for details I was told that the man never read it, not once. Why not get off the distribution, then, I asked – and the indignant reply was “You want me to lose important information?!” The manager didn’t even perceive the absurdity of the situation: the desire to be in the loop, to receive all the information flowing in the organization, was strong enough to blind him to the fact that he had no time for it anyway.

It takes a good deal of willpower to avoid this trap and let go of a large portion of the information one can access. Being in the know is useful when the know is of significance; otherwise it can just add to the clutter and waste inherent in information overload. How about you - are you trying to bite more of the “know” than you can swallow?

Share this:
  • email
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Slashdot
  • Reddit

A blast from the past: weekly status updates

Periodic status reports are one area where you would do well to look for information overload improvement opportunities. In many organizations the network hums with daily reports, weekly reports, and monthly reports, often with large amounts of redundancy. Just take a critical look around you, or in the mirror…

But something reminded me the other day of an extreme example of such redundancy, going back to 1982. I had just joined Intel and relocated to Silicon Valley for some on-the-job training, and among the many wonders of the American Way I was introduced to a wonderful method of sharing status information within our team. Being new, I did not view it critically then; I was just amazed…

Here’s how this worked: every Friday a half dozen of us would get into a small conference room for a weekly team meeting. Each of us had written a weekly status report (with pen on paper, personal computers not having yet penetrated the corporate world) and photocopied six copies ahead of the meeting. Once in the room, we would hand around copies to our peers, so we each ended with a sheaf of everyone else’s reports. Then we’d take turns talking about the week’s events – basically lecturing what was written in our reports. This part was certainly useful, and since there were no laptops or blackberries to distract us with email, it led to real brainstorming and sharing. And then… then we’d all go back to our cubicles and throw all the paper into the large trash cans they contained.

Sounds silly? Oh yes, but again: take a look around you. To be sure, most of the traffic is electronic today, which may save trees (though don’t all those electrons come from somewhere too?) But the redundancy, and the senseless distribution of information without regard to actual need to consume it, these are still there. Who knows, maybe in a few decades someone will blog about it with retrospective derision too…

Share this:
  • email
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Slashdot
  • Reddit

Facebook encroaches on email and blog interaction

I observed in my April newsletter that we may be approaching an inflection point: the next generation of workers may not be as eager as their predecessors to “Live in their Email” – they may well choose to live in Facebook, or some equivalent, instead. Some of the younger generation already forgo using email today: they want to talk to their social circle, and doing so in Facebook, where they do indeed live, comes naturally.

Whether this will also happen (at least in part) in the workplace is still unknown, but it’s worth considering – is being considered, I’ve seen, by the more forward-thinking in management circles. If you haven’t thought about it, you should too. Of course this doesn’t necessarily mean corporate employees will use Facebook itself; they may use equivalent intra- or inter-company social networking tools like Lotus Connections.

Until then, Facebook is expanding its scope in other ways, bent as it seems to be on attaining digital world domination. Of relevance to this blog (and no doubt many others): when I started blogging in 2006, comments to my posts would invariably appear on my blog. Today most of them actually show up on Facebook, as comments on my status updates that inform my friends about new posts on either of my blogs. This is an interesting change: it means that the more permanent record – the blog itself – has less interactive discussion, but it also means that my social circle – and those of my commenters – are more closely in the loop. And since I have many more unique blog readers than friends on Facebook, it also indicates that friends are far more likely to engage in commentary on one’s thoughts.

We’ve come a long way since the days when journalists wrote articles in print media, and the rest of us could at most snail mail a letter to the editor about them…

Share this:
  • email
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Slashdot
  • Reddit

The napping crusade

I had the pleasure of being interviewed for an article on Multitasking by Thea O’Connor, an Australian journalist and health promotion consultant. Of course I visited her web site and I discovered a refreshingly different campaign Thea is crusading for: the Napping Project. The idea being, that “napping is a refreshing and proven solution to tiredness in a time-poor world” – and thus, her intent is to establish the mini-siesta as a socially acceptable and valued practice in our personal and working lives.

At first glance sleeping on the job sounded weird, but then I realized that unless you’re a jet pilot (and possibly if you are too, and you have a copilot) that short nap may be an excellent idea. Not to mention that in today’s brave new world “On the Job” is increasingly fuzzy, thanks to the technology and other trends that did away with our work/life barrier. With Information and Work overload making us all increasingly stressed and tired, and work hours extending into the night, taking a 15 minute nap makes a lot more sense than guzzling another dose of Caffeine and trying to stay awake; and the outcome is sure to make us less stressed and more productive overall. For my part, I do take short rest breaks in the workday if I can; I’m considering going all the way and joining Thea’s project…

Of course, we need to learn how to nap – Thea says you should not sleep more than 20 minutes if you want to wake in an alert state, and many people may not be able to fall asleep in such a short time. My late grandfather, I recall, was definitely able to do it: a busy businessman, he had the capacity to sit in an armchair and fall asleep instantly for a few minutes before going into his next meeting or task; a skill I much envy. He also had an ironclad Work/Life barrier – I may tell you another time.

So what do you think? Would you promote a nap-safe culture in your workplace?

Share this:
  • email
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Slashdot
  • Reddit